Label the evidence
An answer's 'you', 'they' and 'the other person' can become ambiguous. Ask for three sections: A's chart evidence, B's chart evidence and interaction inferences. Each palace or star should be traceable to the correct chart.
Name the person in follow-ups
Instead of 'Should they take the initiative?', ask 'Does that statement refer to A, in the communication situation we described?' If the answer swaps people, correct the attribution before discussing its conclusion. Do not build further questions on a mistaken premise.
Reset the scope when someone changes
One account may hold several people. Replacing a partner should not import another relationship's events or private history. A changed display name does not prove isolation. Use the correct saved person and chart, and open a new relationship case when appropriate.
Recheck restored history
Keep a note defining A and B and the current question. After restoring a conversation, verify those definitions before continuing. Refer to a specific earlier sentence when possible. Authorized historical self-reports are background, not independently verified facts about the current relationship.
Start in the compatibility tool with: 'Label both people's evidence throughout; ask if attribution is uncertain.' This makes a reading easier to follow and exposes mixed-up evidence before it shapes later advice.